Re: E-mail

When it comes to e-mail, as with so many other things, less is more. Of course I’m not talking about those precious missives that read like an epistolary novel and bring joy to our hearts (but let’s agree that these make up a tiny fraction of all the e-mailing that we do). I’m referring to the mundane messages used for transmitting information, typically between employees at a company, often also among family and friends. Few people seem to realize that each e-mail one receives requires time and attention and just enough decision-making to drain a person of a little bit of their daily allowance of focus and energy. Me? I’d rather waste as little of that productivity as is possible. After all, a hundred useless e-mails might even be worth... a whole blog post.

Many e-mails come with attachments, some of which are useful, many of which aren’t. A good number of messages include folks on CC—some of whom are there for a good reason, many of whom aren’t. Titles often don’t point to the content or are missing altogether. And then there are those e-mails that didn’t have to be sent at all. In fact, whether it’s crucial or trivial, sent or received, every e-mail a person handles is an obligation. To answer? Delete? Deal with now? Save for later? Keep as insurance?

There’s an aphorism I like by Henry David Thoreau that seems relevant here: The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for it. In these terms—lots of little e-mails sure can get expensive.

Below are a few of my ideas for lightening this costly load.

  1. Don’t attach attachments that aren’t actual attachments you want me to review. Heads up, logos—this means you.
  2. Use the title bar strategically. That is, try to have it describe the message contents or function. If you want to leave it blank, try not to leave it blank anyway. (Sometimes if a message is just a personal letter, and I want my title to elicit a feeling instead of summarizing my content, I’ll use punctuation marks to create a distinctive non-verbal title. Smileys are fine, though in case you were wondering I’m only impressed by the traditional kind and I suffer eyelid twitches when I see those yellow icons.)
  3. Consider when to reply to an existing thread and when to send a new message. If my last message was an invoice, and now you want to ask me if I do copywriting in German, open up a new e-mail window and start a new thread. (Of course if you’re my boss or my client, do whatever is easiest—just note that I might not be impressed with your workflow habits if your easiest isn’t the same as my most efficient.) This is especially important if your message has any type of legal stature, like when it contains a confirmation of business terms, or it could conceivably be used in court as proof of contact or an agreement of any sort. Nobody wants casual banter (or extraneous attachments) interfering with what has become an official document or proof of contract.
  4. If you’re writing with a question, do include the information I will need to answer that question. Say you want to know if I’m available for a project. Understand that without more information, I’m generally unable to give a yes or no answer. So save us both the time it would take for me to respond with a request for specifics—and simply include the specifics I might need to make an informed decision in the first place. That—and per item number two, above, remember to title your e-mail with something useful, like “Project inquiry” or “Consult opportunity” or “Are you interested in some work?” (...instead of replying to a thread about an invoice from months ago titled “April invoice”).
  5. Use the CC and BCC fields very carefully. Basically you CC everyone who should be made aware of your communication but who need not participate in the conversation. BCC, in turn, is used to show your email to a contact privately. If you’ve been put on BCC don’t use the reply-all or forward functions under any circumstances. Remember—officially, you never even saw the message.
  6. If your message is an instance of simple chatting, meaning that all you want to say is “yep, got it,” “thanks” or “see ya”—consider, using Facebook chat or phone text messaging instead, or pick up the telephone. Because they're stored as separate conversations and kept separate by recipient, individual chat messages don't add to the clutter in ways that individual e-mails do. (Of course mail programs have that chat-style message view functionality, but in my experience that’s a great way to lose any control over who you actually want on CC when it's your turn to add to the thread.)
  7. Don’t include legal supers. It’s implied. If you have to—make yours short and give it a tiny font. And leave out the part about saving paper and not printing this message. It’s unlikely to change any minds.
  8. If you’re wondering whether to use a download link or include the attachment—err on the side of sending the link. (Warning: use your judgment here. If you’re sending baby pictures to the in-laws, maybe save yourself the time it would take to help locate you in-laws’ downloads folder over the phone and just send them already. If you’re sending your baby pictures to me, however, I prefer the dowload link. In fact, if it’s really up to me, what I want most is a link to the site where they’re already up and I can see them without also having to deal with what to do with the files you’ve forced me to download.)
  9. Set your e-mail program to disinclude the attachments when replying to e-mails with attachments. So if you are my in-laws and I send you those baby pictures—don’t bounce them back to me when you’re writing back (and revisit item number six for a refresh on why it may be better to transmit your “how CUTE!!!!” over a medium more suited to the casual chat).
  10. Use the rich text setting to add your personal touch. Use fonts, colors, bold, italics. Like I said, don’t add logos. Don’t add icons for awards your company has won. Don’t add image-based Twitter and Facebook links. Use classic type-based smileys and leave out the picture kind. In my (ruthless, maybe) opinion, this is all in poor taste, and if your recipient’s mail program differs from yours, some or all of these are likely to register as attachments. Think about it—if your e-mail requires scrolling down and you have a bunch of janky gifs and pngs and the label counts six attachments, I’ll have a hard time determining how many of them, if any, are actual documents you might need me to read. (Oh dear, I seem to have circled back to point number one.)

Disclaimer: I realize that people are different (though sometimes I have to strain terribly). Not all of these tips will make every e-mail user’s life easier. Some might even elicit strong protest from other opinionated individuals whose workflows differ from mine. Take what fits, leave what doesn’t. And feel free to rant in a comment below, or even in an e-mail... if you must.


The ubiquitous Polish domofon keypad features numbers with distinct tones, thus allowing for the playback of simple melodies.

The ubiquitous Polish domofon keypad features numbers with distinct tones, thus allowing for the playback of simple melodies.

This one is for the folks in Poland who enjoy the occasional pointless surprise. All you need is one of those ubiquitous black building intercom keypads and maybe a good memory for numbers, if you’re up to the challenge. Enter the digits 058758575130 in sequence and you will hear a familiar melody (possibly to the delight of a passerby who will surely think that you must be a fascinating person). And don’t worry about accidentally ringing, say, apartment 058—just use the key below the digit 9 to disconnect when you are done.

Where did I get this? A few years ago I was that impressed passerby when a guy was showing off for his date in Warsaw’s Różana. Neither of them minded when I swooped in for my little interview, and I’ve been entertaining friends and strangers with this one ever since. 

Six years ago today at Sheremetyevo

A photograph that made one long layover worth every misspent minute. An instant of photojournalistic realness at a time when I was mostly leaving behind that genre for a more reductionist still-life approach. A document from a day in a life suspended between a Murakami-tinged near-month in Japan and a return that... demanded adjustments. A perfect metaphor, maybe, for, well, any number of things.

Photo by Natalia Osiatynska, taken with the Ricoh GR Digital 2 in Sheremetyevo Airport, Moscow, on 2009 04 11.